Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Species"
FeralKitty (talk | contribs) (Names for desert and arctic sub-categories) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST) | Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Wild-cards == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == New type sub-category names == | ||
+ | |||
+ | We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 16:40, 19 May 2008
To-do list for Category:Species: | edit · history · watch · refresh |
---|---|
|
What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --Wismac 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --Jimmcq 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Wild-cards
We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading.
New type sub-category names
We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used?
Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --FeralKitty 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT)