|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | I'll bet nobody's ever asked this before, but which Pinata Species is your favorite? I like Macaraccoon, Pretztail and Fizzlybear. -MiaRe123
| + | What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --[[User:Wismac|Wismac]] 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | There is a lot of great discussion taking place at the [http://www.vivapinataforum.com/register.php?referrerid=20 Viva Pinata Forum], so you may want to join there if you haven't already. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 15:11, 4 September 2006 (EDT)
| |
| − | ----
| |
| − | I'm thinking about adding an eagle species, but since there was some that thought that it was a seagull should I wait?
| |
| − | -Spartan
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | I haven't gotten a chance to watch that video yet, so I don't really have an opinion on which one it is yet... Maybe add it to the [[Unknown]] page for now? --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 18:23, 23 September 2006 (EDT) | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | When you get a chance to watch it, check out the right side at 2:00 to see what appears to be a lion walking by :) --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 18:33, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ----
| |
| − | | |
| − | I don't think that I should be the one who is in progress of writing the pinata bios. It's not that I don't won't to but I want others to feel welcomed to contribute. It's not like the episode things where only I should write those because the story is the same and they should all follow one writing style. People may find or have different impressions of each pinata.
| |
| − | --[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 19:21, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ----
| |
| − | | |
| − | Regarding variants, a grammatically correct sentence would be an improvement. Currently, using "...changes its color to a ''color'' ''species''" is saying that you're changing the color to a color that is named after the species. Writing "''Doing this'' changes it to ''this color or pattern'' would make more sense; alternatively, "''Doing this'' changes the ''species'' to ''this color or pattern''. --Photon Turtle
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | FYI, [[User:Misral93|Misral93]] wasn't responsible for the grammar, and was just using what we'd been consistently entering. This suggestion is better off on the [[:Category talk:Species]] discussion page, and I'm moving it.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Would "Feeding it a turnip changes its color to purple" be a specific example of what you would prefer it to say? --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 00:27, 12 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think that example works well. The content is all great so far, it would be a shame to see it marred by poor writing. Since this is the premier Viva Pinata information site on the Interet at the moment (and I can't imagine that changing), contributors should remember that people with varying English comprehension skills will use it to help them accomplish their in-game goals. This doesn't mean that articles should be written in very basic English, rather they should be written in such a way as to limit mis-interpretation. --PhotonTurtle
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | Has the Penguin pinata been comfirmed? [[User:Misral93|Mistral]] 01:40, 13 November 2006 (EST)
| + | Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | + | == Wild-cards == |
| | | | |
| − | Nope. (See [[Talk:Penguin]].) --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 01:52, 13 November 2006 (EST)
| + | We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading. |
| | | | |
| − | == 68 ==
| |
| | | | |
| − | The number 68 came from one of the interviews with Viva Pinata designer Gregg Mayles... but pretty much everything else has stuck to 60+.
| + | == New type sub-category names == |
| | | | |
| − | So, how many species are there in total? Does the 68 include the 60 we currently have listed plus the 8 sour species? Or are they including the 8 color variants of the White Flutterscotch (since they have different species names)? Or something else entirely?
| + | We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used? |
| | | | |
| − | Do you think there are more than the 60 we know about?
| + | Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT) |
| − | | |
| − | --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:33, 16 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | As it turns out, the number 68 includes the 8 sour versions. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 23:20, 20 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == add another sub-category ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Just a suggestion, but why don't we make another sub-category for the pinatas by mammals, insects, birds, reptiles, and mystical animals. ((Dragonache and Chewnicorn,))--[[User:Sinper-409|Sinper-409]] 17:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --[[User:Wismac|Wismac]] 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST)
| |
We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading.
We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used?
Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --FeralKitty 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
To-do list for Category:Species:
