Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Species"
From PinataIsland.info, the Viva Piñata wiki
Sinper-409 (talk | contribs) (add another sub-category) |
FeralKitty (talk | contribs) (Names for desert and arctic sub-categories) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| − | I | + | What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --[[User:Wismac|Wismac]] 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| − | + | Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | == Wild-cards == | ||
| − | + | We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading. | |
| − | + | == New type sub-category names == | |
| − | - | + | We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used? |
| − | I | + | Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | I think | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 19 May 2008
 To-do list for Category:Species:
|
edit · history · watch · refresh |
|---|---|
| |
What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --Wismac 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --Jimmcq 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Wild-cards
We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading.
New type sub-category names
We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used?
Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --FeralKitty 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
