|
|
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | I'll bet nobody's ever asked this before, but which Pinata Species is your favorite? I like Macaraccoon, Pretztail and Fizzlybear. -MiaRe123 | + | What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --[[User:Wismac|Wismac]] 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | There is a lot of great discussion taking place at the [http://www.vivapinataforum.com/register.php?referrerid=20 Viva Pinata Forum], so you may want to join there if you haven't already. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 15:11, 4 September 2006 (EDT)
| + | Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| − | ----
| |
| − | I'm thinking about adding an eagle species, but since there was some that thought that it was a seagull should I wait?
| |
| − | -Spartan
| |
| | | | |
| | + | == Wild-cards == |
| | | | |
| − | I haven't gotten a chance to watch that video yet, so I don't really have an opinion on which one it is yet... Maybe add it to the [[Unknown]] page for now? --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 18:23, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
| + | We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading. |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | When you get a chance to watch it, check out the right side at 2:00 to see what appears to be a lion walking by :) --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 18:33, 23 September 2006 (EDT)
| + | == New type sub-category names == |
| | | | |
| − | ---- | + | We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used? |
| | | | |
| − | I don't think that I should be the one who is in progress of writing the pinata bios. It's not that I don't won't to but I want others to feel welcomed to contribute. It's not like the episode things where only I should write those because the story is the same and they should all follow one writing style. People may find or have different impressions of each pinata. | + | Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT) |
| − | --[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 19:21, 26 October 2006 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ----
| |
| − | | |
| − | Regarding variants, a grammatically correct sentence would be an improvement. Currently, using "...changes its color to a ''color'' ''species''" is saying that you're changing the color to a color that is named after the species. Writing "''Doing this'' changes it to ''this color or pattern'' would make more sense; alternatively, "''Doing this'' changes the ''species'' to ''this color or pattern''. --Photon Turtle
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | FYI, [[User:Misral93|Misral93]] wasn't responsible for the grammar, and was just using what we'd been consistently entering. This suggestion is better off on the [[:Category talk:Species]] discussion page, and I'm moving it.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Would "Feeding it a turnip changes its color to purple" be a specific example of what you would prefer it to say? --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 00:27, 12 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think that example works well. The content is all great so far, it would be a shame to see it marred by poor writing. Since this is the premier Viva Pinata information site on the Interet at the moment (and I can't imagine that changing), contributors should remember that people with varying English comprehension skills will use it to help them accomplish their in-game goals. This doesn't mean that articles should be written in very basic English, rather they should be written in such a way as to limit mis-interpretation. --PhotonTurtle | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Has the Penguin pinata been comfirmed? [[User:Misral93|Mistral]] 01:40, 13 November 2006 (EST)
| |
Latest revision as of 16:40, 19 May 2008
 To-do list for Category:Species:
|
edit · history · watch · refresh
|
- Fill in missing Infobox data for each species, as discovered
- Make corrections for Variant (species colors?), Evolve, and Rarity
- Write bios for different species
- Badgesicle, Chippopotamus, Cinnamonkey, Cocoadile, Crowla, Doenut, Dragumfly, Eaglair, Fizzlybear, Fourheads, Galagoogoo, Jameleon, Juicygoose, Lackatoad, Lickatoad, Mallowolf, Newtgat, Profitamole, Quackberry, Raisant, Roario, Shellybean, Sherbat, Swanana, Sweetooth, Zumbug
- Add a couple paragraphs (linked) text on Category page, touching on general species concepts like:
- a pinata's value, how it can increase by wearing accessories
- trading and selling pinatas
- species development; creating new species
|
What the heck happened to the Alphabetical order of the species? I tried to edit it and fix it, but not sure where it's pulling the info from... Just FYI... --Wismac 18:38, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Strange... I might have messed something up when I was messing around with the templates earlier... I have the reverted the template. --Jimmcq 19:08, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Wild-cards
We should add pictures and descriptions of the Wild-card to it's species page as we find them. Either under the “Species variants” heading or make a new Wild-card heading.
New type sub-category names
We should have sub-categories for desert and arctic species. Are those names good enough, or are there other terms that should be used?
Also regarding the "type" subcategories as they are now, I think it's best to just simply continue to use one subcategory for a type (e.g. aquatic), instead of a more complex hierarchy, even if it contains species that aren't in, say, Classic. I think when the visitor sees the (new layout for the) species article, it will be obvious which games a species may/may not be found in. --FeralKitty 20:40, 19 May 2008 (EDT)
To-do list for Category:Species:
