Talk:Bluebell

I know I'm new here and all, but I'd like to help get this wikia up to the highest standard that it can. I added a few headers under the Bluebell uses section that I would like some opinions on. I understand if you don't want them, but I think that it helps users distinguish between the different uses. Also, I noticed that the majority of pages don't adhere to the style guide, causing in a lack of consistency between pages. I would like to edit these to match the style guide, I would just like to know if that style guide is up to date and the current 'expected' format. -- Andrealinia 12:10, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I think we can get by without the additional headers. For one, if we put them in, it would mean editing m (species and plant) x n tabs worth of occurrences, to make everything else consistent. There really hasn't been a formal sub-order for the uses, and I'm not sure we really need to redo pages just to list requirement uses first, then variant uses, then trick uses. It's difficult enough trying to keep the wording consistent, without expecting contributors to insert or move lines up or down to keep them in a specific order, too.

As for the style guide, I believe it's up to date. Yes, many articles don't match the guide, and it would be nice to make the wording consistent between tabs, and across articles. Ideally, it would be nice if additions made did match the style guide, but there's a lot of missing information too, so I'm just as grateful to see missing uses get added, as seeing wording be consistent. --FeralKitty (talk) 15:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)