Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jardiniero"
Jardiniero (talk | contribs) (Rumor Ban) |
Jardiniero (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Thank you for your contributions, but this is not the place to post your imaginary content | + | Thank you for your contributions, but this is not the place to post your imaginary content''', even if it's something you know to be true, because I don't want people to immediately want to go to this site for breaking news -- I'd rather lower my page rank''' You are welcome to suggest your 'rumors' in the forums. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] |
== Rumor Ban == | == Rumor Ban == |
Revision as of 23:22, 3 January 2007
Thank you for your contributions, but this is not the place to post your imaginary content, even if it's something you know to be true, because I don't want people to immediately want to go to this site for breaking news -- I'd rather lower my page rank You are welcome to suggest your 'rumors' in the forums. --Jimmcq
Rumor Ban
So I was just wondering if I'll get an apology from you when the "imaginary" content turns true?
I'm providing information that I know is accurate, at fairly great risk, only to get my work deleted and then banned for a day -- which I consider to be rude. I would expect that, when you finally understand that I was correct, you won't be so hasty to ban me for offering a preview.
Unless of course, you work for Rare, in which case, you know that what I posted is accurate, but you don't want me spoiling the characters for the future. I could understand this, but if it is the case, then understand why I'm offended by your use of "imaginary" above, especially considering you would know as well as I that what I posted was real.