Difference between revisions of "Template talk:File information/wizard"
From PinataIsland.info, the Viva Piñata wiki
FeralKitty (talk | contribs) |
(:::No worries. Do you think it looks better now or before when the boxes were 100% width? ~~~~) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Actually I just took any reference to "navbox" out because I guess we might be eliminating it's css class altogether - and it still works fine. Do you think it looks better with the "compressed" view until you expand it, or should I add width=100% to the tables? –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Xenocidic|<font color="black">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 15:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC) | :Actually I just took any reference to "navbox" out because I guess we might be eliminating it's css class altogether - and it still works fine. Do you think it looks better with the "compressed" view until you expand it, or should I add width=100% to the tables? –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Xenocidic|<font color="black">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 15:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Ah, my mistake! No, there's no performance hit at all; the collapsible tables are completely handled on the client side. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC) | ::Ah, my mistake! No, there's no performance hit at all; the collapsible tables are completely handled on the client side. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 17:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::No worries. Do you think it looks better now or before when the boxes were 100% width? –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Xenocidic|<font color="black">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 17:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 10:32, 28 August 2008
I think that a wizard can be helpful, but I have to mention again that {{Navbox}} is the most complex template at this wiki, and its use has affected performance in the past. Since the plan is to abandon {{Navbox}} use (and convert what was the sole remaining instance of use to table format, once the species names are all known), is this a prototype that's going to be converted also? --FeralKitty (talk) 15:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
This doesn't call the navbox directly, it simply uses one of it's classes: class="navbox collapsible collapsed". Will it still cause performance issues? –xenocidic (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)- Actually I just took any reference to "navbox" out because I guess we might be eliminating it's css class altogether - and it still works fine. Do you think it looks better with the "compressed" view until you expand it, or should I add width=100% to the tables? –xenocidic (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, my mistake! No, there's no performance hit at all; the collapsible tables are completely handled on the client side. --FeralKitty (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)