Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Edit section"
From PinataIsland.info, the Viva Piñata wiki
(New page: I still don't like the idea of having to hardcode in the section number, but I think this could work well for the Species articles that are getting a little too cumbersome too edit the ent...) |
(:I poured over http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words and didn't see any way to get the section number to come thru with a magic word. In theory most article's section numbers won't change mu) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I still don't like the idea of having to hardcode in the section number, but I think this could work well for the Species articles that are getting a little too cumbersome too edit the entire thing at once. Thoughts? --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | I still don't like the idea of having to hardcode in the section number, but I think this could work well for the Species articles that are getting a little too cumbersome too edit the entire thing at once. Thoughts? --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I poured over http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words and didn't see any way to get the section number to come thru with a magic word. In theory most article's section numbers won't change much, especially the species and the plants, so I agree that using them in those cases at least is probably a good idea. –<font face="Verdana">[[User:Xenocidic|<font color="black">'''xeno'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Xenocidic|<font color="black">cidic</font>]] ([[User talk:Xenocidic|<font color="black">talk</font>]])</font> 15:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:31, 26 August 2008
I still don't like the idea of having to hardcode in the section number, but I think this could work well for the Species articles that are getting a little too cumbersome too edit the entire thing at once. Thoughts? --Jimmcq 15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- I poured over http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Magic_words and didn't see any way to get the section number to come thru with a magic word. In theory most article's section numbers won't change much, especially the species and the plants, so I agree that using them in those cases at least is probably a good idea. –xenocidic (talk) 15:31, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
