Difference between revisions of "Talk:Whirlm"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Go for it. There are a lot of items that we probably need a better picture of. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 11:06, 18 November 2006 (EST) | Go for it. There are a lot of items that we probably need a better picture of. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 11:06, 18 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The small glare spot on top makes this pic subject to change, but this is the kind of close up pic I was thinking about. Or maybe the spot is too much and we should change it back to the old one for the time being. Whatever the case this is more a model of the kind of pic I think we need. We can do better. What do you say Feral, Jim? | ||
| + | --[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 14:40, 18 November 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:40, 18 November 2006
Variant: Turnip -> Purple --Jimmcq 10:17, 7 November 2006 (EST)
I honestly don't like this picture. I know that it shows several Whirlms, but nothing up close and in detail. If someone can come up with a really good reason to keep it, than it shall stay, but I would like to add a new picture. One whirlm, up close, centered, and in detail.
--Spartan 04:41, 18 November 2006 (EST)
Go for it. There are a lot of items that we probably need a better picture of. --Jimmcq 11:06, 18 November 2006 (EST)
The small glare spot on top makes this pic subject to change, but this is the kind of close up pic I was thinking about. Or maybe the spot is too much and we should change it back to the old one for the time being. Whatever the case this is more a model of the kind of pic I think we need. We can do better. What do you say Feral, Jim?
--Spartan 14:40, 18 November 2006 (EST)
