Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ant Eater"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I change my mind, I would like an ant-eater pinata, and it still might exist but I believe that this theory has been dissproven. Delete it we can always make it again in the rare event. | I change my mind, I would like an ant-eater pinata, and it still might exist but I believe that this theory has been dissproven. Delete it we can always make it again in the rare event. | ||
| − | -[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 29 September 2006 (EDT) | + | --[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 29 September 2006 (EDT) |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Oh come on just kill this page. The evidence is over-whelming and on the odd chance an ant eater does exist we can make another. | ||
| + | --[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 2 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:05, 2 October 2006
The existence of this creature is in doubt. Speculation was based on a brief obscured appearance in one video. It is most likely a Tafly. --Jimmcq 17:00, 28 September 2006 (EDT)
I think you should just delete the ant eater article. Theyre the same thing. Patterns the same. body the same.... -Moozipan
Don't delete this just get. It's existence is in doubt but I thought I saw something that looked like this during new vid. Although it could of been a tafly.
-Spartan
Right now most evidence points to the ant-eater not existing. -- Ramen 23:21, 28 September 2006 (EDT)
I change my mind, I would like an ant-eater pinata, and it still might exist but I believe that this theory has been dissproven. Delete it we can always make it again in the rare event. --Spartan 29 September 2006 (EDT)
Oh come on just kill this page. The evidence is over-whelming and on the odd chance an ant eater does exist we can make another.
--Spartan 2 October 2006 (EDT)
