Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Ruffian cards"
From PinataIsland.info, the Viva Piñata wiki
FeralKitty (talk | contribs) |
FeralKitty (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do we want this category to be limited to cards that invite or send away a Ruffian, or should it be more general, and include any type of card pertaining to Ruffians, such as Ruffian concept art? --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 19:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | Do we want this category to be limited to cards that invite or send away a Ruffian, or should it be more general, and include any type of card pertaining to Ruffians, such as Ruffian concept art? --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 19:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
: As a follow-on note, the app already takes the narrower view and only keeps Ruffian cards in this category. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 19:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | : As a follow-on note, the app already takes the narrower view and only keeps Ruffian cards in this category. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 19:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :: I suppose, for the general, at least for the wiki. Then again, when someone looks up Ruffians, I am not sure they would want "concept art." Which ever is easier for the user/app? --[[User:ImaTestWentBad|ImaTestWentBad]] 21:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::: I guess it's hard to know what a wiki user would expect to find in this category. For a different category, such as seeds, I wouldn't suggest mixing concept art of a seed in with seed cards, but it's not as clear for this category. Either way, the wiki doesn't have to cater to the app. | ||
| + | ::: I think it would only become a problem for users if this category ended up with a lot of cards, and the other types of cards made it difficult to pick out the actual Ruffian cards. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] ([[User_talk:FeralKitty|talk]]) 22:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:30, 16 February 2010
Do we want this category to be limited to cards that invite or send away a Ruffian, or should it be more general, and include any type of card pertaining to Ruffians, such as Ruffian concept art? --FeralKitty (talk) 19:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- As a follow-on note, the app already takes the narrower view and only keeps Ruffian cards in this category. --FeralKitty (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose, for the general, at least for the wiki. Then again, when someone looks up Ruffians, I am not sure they would want "concept art." Which ever is easier for the user/app? --ImaTestWentBad 21:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- I guess it's hard to know what a wiki user would expect to find in this category. For a different category, such as seeds, I wouldn't suggest mixing concept art of a seed in with seed cards, but it's not as clear for this category. Either way, the wiki doesn't have to cater to the app.
- I think it would only become a problem for users if this category ended up with a lot of cards, and the other types of cards made it difficult to pick out the actual Ruffian cards. --FeralKitty (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose, for the general, at least for the wiki. Then again, when someone looks up Ruffians, I am not sure they would want "concept art." Which ever is easier for the user/app? --ImaTestWentBad 21:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
