Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jimmcq"
(→Wiki Space / Dragonache Pics) |
m |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Unfortunately bandwidth is expensive. When adding pictures to the [[Dragonache]] page I tried to choose pictures that showed different features (manes, ridges, tails, etc.). Maybe you could come up with better images to replace the existing ones that show these differences? --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 14:37, 23 February 2007 (EST) | Unfortunately bandwidth is expensive. When adding pictures to the [[Dragonache]] page I tried to choose pictures that showed different features (manes, ridges, tails, etc.). Maybe you could come up with better images to replace the existing ones that show these differences? --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 14:37, 23 February 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Repetitive Content == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Just curious with what you think of repetitive content similar to the [[pond]] page. I recently edited it to list the species that require water. To me it seems useful to have that information on that page and helps give the page some value, but I realize its just repeating what's aready listed on those species pages. I was also thinking of listing species varients on the [[varients]] page, but again I'm curious if this is something this wiki thinks is worth doing and should be done? ~ [[User:Kaya|Kaya]] 13:28, 6 March 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 6 March 2007
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Wiki Space / Dragonache Pics
Do you have any issues with me putting up a page on the different wildcard features of the Dragonache? I don't want to do it on the Dragonache page itself, but figured I'd link from it. I've built a fairly extensive list of features on my user page and thought it would be cool to provide pictures showing the different features. I have a quote from BIGsheep indicating that the features are random - it seems like the color is the only thing you can actually control.
--Teker0 11:44, 22 February 2007 (EST)
So what exactly have you been able to learn? Did you just want to illustrate all of the various possible Dragonache feature configurations? --Jimmcq 23:29, 22 February 2007 (EST)
Yeah, I thought we might just list and have pictures of the different features. I didn't know if you've got a quota on the server where you might not want a bunch of pictures. From what I can tell, most of the stuff with the mine is random. There may be some advantages to having candaries or a lantern, but I'm consistantly getting eggs in 2-6 game days without them now.
--Teker0 10:01, 23 February 2007 (EST)
Unfortunately bandwidth is expensive. When adding pictures to the Dragonache page I tried to choose pictures that showed different features (manes, ridges, tails, etc.). Maybe you could come up with better images to replace the existing ones that show these differences? --Jimmcq 14:37, 23 February 2007 (EST)
Repetitive Content
Just curious with what you think of repetitive content similar to the pond page. I recently edited it to list the species that require water. To me it seems useful to have that information on that page and helps give the page some value, but I realize its just repeating what's aready listed on those species pages. I was also thinking of listing species varients on the varients page, but again I'm curious if this is something this wiki thinks is worth doing and should be done? ~ Kaya 13:28, 6 March 2007 (EST)
