|
|
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Yes, I know the wording is inconsistent, but that's exactly how it is in the game.
| + | It seems that each color of Flutterscotch may have different romance and/or trick requirements. Needs more investigation. --[[User:Jimmcq|jimmcq]] 06:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC) |
| − | Color variants include yellow, blue, and (I think) green. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | When you feed a Buttercup to a "White Flutterscotch" it becomes a species named "Yellow Flutterscotch" which is a little strange because its more like an evolve than a standard variant... others don't seem to behave this way. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 12:21, 11 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Woah, there's a lot of different colours for the flutterscotch. Treated differently than all the other species? -- [[User:Ramen|Ramen]] 14:11, 11 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | The Flutterscotches are treated differently than the other pinata. Each 'variant' is actually an evolution into a different species. Look in the encyclopedia; the variant fields for the White Flutterscotch are each X'd out and each color you've discovered will have its own entry in the species list. Also, I've attracted three White Flutterscotches into my bug garden by changing the color of each one as it becomes a resident. I think most pinatas stop coming once you have two of the same species. --[[User:Pure|Pure]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | I hear what you're saying, and it's a very good piece of information, to find out how the Encyclopedia actually treats them. The big concern though about treating them as species on the wiki, would be in maintaining 9 ''almost identical'' species pages, whenever a bit of information needs to get added or changed. I could see them getting out of sync very easily, which would confuse people, as to which page is accurate. Also, it's convenient for people to just come to one page to see the colors listed in the variant table, even though they're evolved species. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 18:45, 12 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Yeah, I think we need to keep these all on one page and treat them like variants even though technically speaking they aren't. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 19:05, 12 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I think we should change the wiki from "White Flutterscotch" to just "Flutterscotch". --[[User:Misral93|Misral93]]
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | It used to be "Flutterscotch", but was moved to "White Flutterscotch" (proper species/Encyclopedia name) because there is no species named "Flutterscotch". There's a link from "Flutterscotch" to this page, so it can be found, either way. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 20:43, 12 November 2006 (EST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | Should there be pages for all the variants/species of Flutterscotches that just redirect to this page? It sort of makes sense considering Flutterscotches are a special case. It might help the folks that search for a specific Flutterscotch species, expecting to be taken directly to a page. -[[User:Nokboy|Nokboy]] 00:02, 17 January 2007 (EST)
| |
It seems that each color of Flutterscotch may have different romance and/or trick requirements. Needs more investigation. --jimmcq 06:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
