Difference between revisions of "Talk:Food chain"

From PinataIsland.info, the Viva Piñata wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Conflicts)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
Sure, I was just noting that because it was pointed out in not one but ''two'' videos.  But that works.
 
Sure, I was just noting that because it was pointed out in not one but ''two'' videos.  But that works.
 
--[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 15:28, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 15:28, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Conflicts ==
 +
 +
We gotta be careful about what we designate as species likely to fight... There are plenty of reasons that they might be fighting other than general species animosity.  --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 01:39, 11 November 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 23:39, 10 November 2006

Wait... some pinatas eat each other? Sweet.

Food Chain

Yeah, it definitely sounds like it... One of the common examples is that the sparrow is attracted to your garden because it wants to eat the worm pinata.

There was also mention that in order to attract certain pinata to your garden you need to break open existing ones because they want to eat thet candy that's inside.


Passive

I'm thinking now that the food chain may be passive. While some pinatas may be attracted to other pinatas, as a potential source of a meal, it's likely that they don't actively eat other those other pinatas, but have to be given a specific pinata to eat (e.g. to trigger an event, such as residence, mating, or possibly changing into a different species.) --FeralKitty 16:13, 3 September 2006 (EDT)


Sours

I suspect a large number of pinatas would fight with a sour. I think the conflict chart should be reserved for resident species who don't get along. --FeralKitty 04:40, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Sure, I was just noting that because it was pointed out in not one but two videos. But that works. --Spartan 15:28, 28 October 2006 (EDT)

Conflicts

We gotta be careful about what we designate as species likely to fight... There are plenty of reasons that they might be fighting other than general species animosity. --Jimmcq 01:39, 11 November 2006 (EST)