Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wild-card"
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
I personally got that information from a '''very''' reliable source. They wanted something that had the potential to reward any player, irrespective of their skill level. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 01:22, 13 December 2006 (EST) | I personally got that information from a '''very''' reliable source. They wanted something that had the potential to reward any player, irrespective of their skill level. --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 01:22, 13 December 2006 (EST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ok if the '''very''' reliable source is who I think it is then I will leave this alone even though i think rare should have atleast made them easier to get--[[User:Lord squazzil|Lord squazzil]] 03:53, 14 December 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 00:53, 14 December 2006
I've been thinking about this Wild Card event and based on what the poster said, that he was mass breeding, maybe it has to do with:
a) Romance X number of piñatas of the species in a set time.
b) The Xth Piñata to be born of that species.
c) Have a certain amount of eggs still unhatched and romance the piñata.
d) Have a certain amount of piñatas of the species in the garden while romancing.
These are just guesses I made, but maybe there is much more to it (and there probably is). I'll try experimenting with these soon, once I finish all awards, which should be in a couple of days.
--ZombieInfection 23:16, 12 December 2006 (EST)ZombieInfection
There is nothing that you can do to increase the chances of an egg hatching a wild card. "Wild Cards are purely random, and any egg has equal chance of being a wild card." --Jimmcq 23:20, 12 December 2006 (EST)
who has authenticated the idea that wild cards are purely random because there could be things that increase the chances of it happening?--Lord squazzil 01:07, 13 December 2006 (EST)
I personally got that information from a very reliable source. They wanted something that had the potential to reward any player, irrespective of their skill level. --Jimmcq 01:22, 13 December 2006 (EST)
ok if the very reliable source is who I think it is then I will leave this alone even though i think rare should have atleast made them easier to get--Lord squazzil 03:53, 14 December 2006 (EST)