Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of minor characters"
(→Appearances) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
That turned out just fine --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 18:43, 30 September 2006 (EDT) | That turned out just fine --[[User:Jimmcq|Jimmcq]] 18:43, 30 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What qualifies an appearance? A speaking part? -- [[User:Ramen|Ramen]] 22:47, 30 September 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 30 September 2006
The ruffians aren't minor characters. So far we've only seen them once but they'll be back. --Spartan
If they aren't one of the eight main characters listed by name in the end credits then I'm considering them minor for now. We can change this later though. --Jimmcq 15:05, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
But the Ruffians probably do deserve to keep their own page because they will be part of the Xbox 360 game. So they'll probably have mentions in both places. --Jimmcq 15:15, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
Appearances
Would it not be smart to list their first appearance, or even all their appearances, as reference? -- Ramen 16:47, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
Yeah, we should update the descriptions to start with something like "First appeared as blah blah blah (episode name)"... and end the description with "Famous quotes include blah blah blah"... but try to keep it in paragraph form. --Jimmcq 17:00, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
I tried the "Appearances in ..." sentence at the start of the paragraph, and it just didn't look/read as well. I did tack the quotes on to the end, though :) --FeralKitty 18:26, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
That turned out just fine --Jimmcq 18:43, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
What qualifies an appearance? A speaking part? -- Ramen 22:47, 30 September 2006 (EDT)
