From, the Viva Piñata wiki
Revision as of 13:33, 5 May 2009 by FeralKitty (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This should be entered as a Quackberry variant on the Quackberry page, and not as its own species. If I knew how to delete a page entirely, I would. Diela 10:51, 12 November 2006 (EST)

Diela: I believe this is an Evolve (different species) rather than a variant (differently colored, but same species). --FeralKitty 13:22, 11 November 2006 (EST)

Juicygoose is an independent species, not a variant. --Jimmcq 14:27, 11 November 2006 (EST)

Okay... good to know the distinction. I guess I was thinking that variants and evolved species were the same thing.n Diela 10:51, 12 November 2006 (EST)

I noticed that this Juicygoose page in TiP tab is one of the few (if not the only one) that has an Arctic variant table. Is this something that should be in every pinata page that has a arctic or desert variant? I was a bit wherry to remove it, but I haven't seen it in any other pages so far --ImaTestWentBad 09:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

A subgarden variant table really isn't necessary, since we're not showing subgarden (or their variant) images on the species articles. I've been replacing them with a stock phrase (which needs a rewrite at some point, to point people to not-yet-written subgarden variant details). The species articles from Arocknid to Chippopotamus‎ (i.e., Bunnycomb since it has an Arctic relative) are good examples of consistent phrasing/layout or whatever, since those pages have been cleaned up to match the style guide. If you diff one of my edits to them, you'll get a feel for what I try to cleanup. --FeralKitty (talk) 16:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Quick question for you. Should I be placing the images of PVCs on the Classic tab as well as Trouble In Paradise tab? I see that it's on this Juicygoose page, but I have not been doing this. --ImaTestWentBad 19:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

It's fine to do that, and it's been done here and there, to improve or add missing images for Classic. The thinking is that the PV cards should be a higher-quality digital image than some of the older snapshots. It also helps to consolidate/cut back on the number of images loaded for these pages, and to present a more modern, uniform look. --FeralKitty (talk) 20:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)