Difference between revisions of "Talk:Food chain"
FeralKitty (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I suspect a large number of pinatas would fight with a sour. I think the conflict chart should be reserved for ''resident'' species who don't get along. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 04:40, 28 October 2006 (EDT) | I suspect a large number of pinatas would fight with a sour. I think the conflict chart should be reserved for ''resident'' species who don't get along. --[[User:FeralKitty|FeralKitty]] 04:40, 28 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sure, I was just noting that because it was pointed out in not one but ''two'' videos. But that works. | ||
| + | --[[User:Spartan|Spartan]] 15:28, 28 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:28, 28 October 2006
Wait... some pinatas eat each other? Sweet.
Food Chain
Yeah, it definitely sounds like it... One of the common examples is that the sparrow is attracted to your garden because it wants to eat the worm pinata.
There was also mention that in order to attract certain pinata to your garden you need to break open existing ones because they want to eat thet candy that's inside.
Passive
I'm thinking now that the food chain may be passive. While some pinatas may be attracted to other pinatas, as a potential source of a meal, it's likely that they don't actively eat other those other pinatas, but have to be given a specific pinata to eat (e.g. to trigger an event, such as residence, mating, or possibly changing into a different species.) --FeralKitty 16:13, 3 September 2006 (EDT)
Sours
I suspect a large number of pinatas would fight with a sour. I think the conflict chart should be reserved for resident species who don't get along. --FeralKitty 04:40, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
Sure, I was just noting that because it was pointed out in not one but two videos. But that works. --Spartan 15:28, 28 October 2006 (EDT)
